Opening Night Remarks + Toast Speech from Ana Garcia Doyle,

Opening Night Remarks by Ana Garcia Doyle, Executive Director, One Earth Collective

Good evening. Happy Earth Day! On behalf of our Board of Directors, staff, and festival planning team, I want to welcome you to the 15th annual One Earth Film Festival Opening Night Screening & Reception!

Tonight, we join “all together now” as GenerationWe. 

We do this in the face of our climate crisis, when more and more folks are – and will be endangered; I use this term intentionally, to refer to the current administration’s recent repeal of the Endangerment Finding, an important 2009 EPA determination that greenhouse gases threaten public health and welfare, and should be regulated under the Clean Air Act.

We come together as GenWe also in the spirit of hope and determination that was embodied by pioneering conservationist, Nobel Peace Prize nominee, and hero-in-our-times, Dr. Jane Goodall, who passed just last fall.

As we stand all together now, I invite us to – ourselves – embody 3 things:

  1. Embodying the notion that the voices, experiences, and solutions of the most vulnerable among us must be centered – this especially means young people, and those who will feel (are already feeling) climate change’s impacts most disproportionately

  2. Embodying the understanding that seeing our way to a more just, resilient planet will take different modalities – not only science and facts and research and data (all very important), but also stories and creativity and connections and reflection and compassion and community

  3. Embodying the resolve to enable the kinds of cultural and mindset shifts that are required to practice and bring about new worlds. As author Arundhati Roy wrote: Another world is not only possible, she is on her way. On a quiet day, I can hear her breathing.

So, as you hang onto your cocktail cups, in all of your patience (thank you!) I would like to invoke Dr. Jane Goodall’s own words as we make an interactive, collective toast. She said: “Hope is (not) simply passive wishful thinking; real hope . . .requires action and engagement.” So please turn to someone next to you, preferably someone you do not already know, and complete this sentence: I toast to . . . then complete the sentence with an action you want to take on environmental issues. Let’s take a minute to do that.  I toast to . . . (Call everyone back.) Wonderful! Now let’s wrap up all of that action + engagement, raise our glasses, and toast to HOPE!

Film Spotlight: Interview with Kate Levy, Director of Whose Water?

Film Poster for Whose Water? & Kate Levy

Water is life, but who controls it? Who gets access? And who is left behind? Whose Water? takes audiences inside frontline communities across the U.S. fighting for safe affordable water and exposes the systems that determine who has the power, and who doesn’t. 

One Earth (OE): Water access is becoming one of the defining environmental issues of our time. What motivated you to explore this story in Whose Water?

Kate Levy (KL): In 2014, I began working with Flint activists to help expose high levels of lead in their water… residents were being labeled as pariahs. At the same time, I was documenting mass water shutoffs in Detroit. A few years later, advocates working toward federal legislation for the human right to water asked me to help tell stories from across the country. Because I had been documenting water issues alongside activists, I was able to explore how these crises are part of a larger system.

OE: How does Whose Water? reveal the intersection of environmental justice, community rights, and water policy?

KL: When the state displaced Flint’s locally elected officials and switched to a corrosive water source to cut costs, it showed how deeply water systems are tied to democratic power. That became the lens for the film: a community’s ability to govern itself is directly connected to its access to water. You see this play out in every location we visit. If you live in a city, ask: does your community have a water affordability program? If not, who’s working on it? In rural areas, look into who is protecting groundwater from pollution or industrial expansion. Across the country, communities are organizing through testing, legal action, and grassroots advocacy.

Film Spotlight: Interview with Director of In Our Nature, James Parker

James Parker

One Earth(OE): What inspired the story behind In Our Nature?

James Parker(JP): This film journey began about a year and a half ago, when my co-producer Juliet Grable and I started paying attention to two trends we found hard to ignore. First, that kids were spending upwards of seven hours a day on screens - in some cases much more - and less than five minutes outside. And second, that nature and environmental education were increasingly being pulled into partisan debates.

That led us to a bigger question: what does the future look like if those trends continue? What happens in five, ten, fifty years if children are less connected to nature and, in turn, less connected to each other and to the systems that support life?

That question set us on an inquiry to better understand environmental education across the country and how different communities are working to expand access to it. What we found, pretty quickly, was something hopeful. That nature, and especially environmental education, can be one of our most powerful bridge builders and forces for community.

Yes, parts of this work intersect with complicated and sometimes polarized issues. But it’s also one of the few tools we have left that consistently brings people into shared space, shared understanding, and a shared sense of responsibility.

OE:How does the film show the relationship between people and the ecosystems they live in?

JP: One thing the film tries to do is move away from the idea that nature is something separate from us - or that it only looks a certain way, or is meant for a certain kind of person.

Instead, the film shows how closely tied our well-being is to the environments we’re part of, whether that’s in cities, rural communities, or somewhere in between. You see it in how access to nature impacts mental health, education, and opportunity. But you also see it in more personal ways, like how being outside can create space for reflection, for healing, and for connection. And what becomes clear is that this relationship is reciprocal. When people feel more connected to the places they live, they tend to care for them differently. That’s really where environmental education comes in - it helps build that connection, and with it, a deeper sense of responsibility.

OE: What does the concept of GenWe(intergenerational community working together) mean in the context of restoring nature?

JP: The environmental and social challenges we face are long-term and span generations. So restoring nature isn’t just about a single effort or a single group. It’s about creating spaces where knowledge, experience, and perspective can be shared across generations. Especially at a time when algorithms can sometimes get in the way of that kind of knowledge transfer and connection. Ultimately, restoring nature is also about restoring relationships - between people, between generations, and between people and the natural world.

Film Spotlight: Interview with Director of How To Power A City, Melanie La Rosa

Movie Poster for How To Power A City & Melanie La Rosa

One Earth (OE): Cities are at the center of the climate conversation. What inspired the focus on urban energy solutions?

Melanie(M): I learned about solar being introduced to New York City, where I live, and also wind power throughout the state. I grew very curious about how this works. How can one tiny solar system on a high-rise make a difference? How can more infrastructure fit into an already crowded place? How does wind power in a rural area like upstate NY even help New York City? I didn't know, at the time I started the film, how the grid worked and I had a real crash course in engineering and physics, which I loved.

My research was expansive at the beginning and I was also looking at rural areas. But much of the information at that time, for rural places, would be something like an off-grid cabin in the woods. I felt like people understood how that worked but understanding of how this works in cities and congested urban areas was more limited. Plus, it was a different time when I was doing this research (as far back as 2015 although mostly in 2016-17) and cities were making very impressive commitments to renewable energy. So that's what I followed. The story that was emerging was about how cities wanted to do this, and I wanted to see how they would chip away at it.

In the end, I did include rural areas through the Puerto Rico and Vermont stories. I have several takeaways from these differences. There's no one size fits all plan. Places like Las Vegas and New York City have vastly different energy usage than a rural area in Puerto Rico. Also the grid is important for urban areas but in Puerto Rico and Vermont, the solar installations were actually re-designs, to an extent, of the grid. In both of those places there are mountains and the grid extends through these mountains for miles, to reach small, clustered populations. That means miles upon miles of cables through largely unpopulated areas. Both also regularly have extreme weather events that damage the grid, meaning lots of maintenance. In both places people felt like this design of a central grid caused a lot of expense and maintenance, but local microgrids made more sense and were also easier to maintain. 

But that's not really viable in New York City, for example, because of the massive energy use and interconnectness. While there are some microgrids being introduced to cities, the urban solutions have to chip away at a bigger system and add clean infrastructure like Renewable Rikers, which is a piece of a system. But an important piece that replaces the most polluting part of the old system with new, clean technology. This also addresses issues like air pollution and environmental justice in addition to energy production. 

Because each place in the film has such different geography, needs, energy use, and available resources, I'm glad that, in the end, my title of "How To Power A City" extended to include smaller areas and populations as well as large urban areas.

OE: What challenges did you uncover when trying to transition an entire city to renewable energy?

M: In Las Vegas, Mayor Goodman truly led the nation and maybe the world in transitioning the city's energy use to renewables. The challenges there were figuring out how to finance it, although when I interviewed her for the film she really didn't speak about that much, as it was more of an administrative challenge. She said her city council was all very aligned in wanting the renewables.

In New York City, the challenges are enormous. As mentioned above, the design of creating something that will make a difference and also be feasible. Getting that approved by the City Council. Then inevitable backlash and delays in implementation. In the NYC story in the film, Costa Constantinides leads the passage of two key laws: Renewable Rikers, which I focused on, and also a NYC Green New Deal law that limits building emissions. He had to face the challenges of fossil fuel lobbyists who don't want to see these get passed and implemented. He had to build and lead coalitions of supporters for years to get these laws passed. 

This didn't make it into the film because we'd concluded filming before the pandemic, but since you are asking about challenges one big one is that even with great laws like Renewable Rikers getting passed, they are not always implemented right away. Opponents of these laws include building owners who don't want to invest in cleaner heating systems, and are trying to undermine the fines that buildings will pay if they don't comply with the NYC Green New Deal. Renewable Rikers is current law but  it's progress has been very slow, and also our last mayor made it a relatively low priority level. There's a lot of hope that under Mayor Mamdani it will speed up. 

An important overarching challenge is that the public does not understand how energy systems work, even if they are generally in support of renewable energy. That's why events like the One Earth Film Festival are so important to start the conversations that help us learn together. There is an incredible amount of misinformation in the news about renewable energy, and yet we all stand to benefit so much from learning how these work so we can advocate for them in our own communities. It's wonderful to know you are keeping this conversation going.

OE: How can communities and policymakers work together to power cities more sustainably?

M: This is really the core question the film addresses - because each community differs in needs, priorities, budget, and geography, each must determine what works best for them. But there are some throughlines. City council members told me that hearing from community members about wanting solar or wind power is important. Someone has to start a conversation! If a policy maker never hears from local residents  that they'd like to see solar or wind in their community or they'd like a town hall or event, you can understand how other things might take priority. So just engaging at a very basic level is crucial. In my own neighborhood in Queens we have a group that meets regularly to talk about energy innovations in the city, makes phone calls, and engages with state policies. 

Informing yourself about what works locally is also key, and there are groups like Solar United Neighbors that work in dozens of states that can be a great starting point. 

By the way, most policymakers addressing energy policy are at the city or state level, not the federal level. 

I can share a variety of ways I've seen communities work with policy makers: 

In the film, just a few examples are:

- New York City policy makers hold town halls to discuss how solar or wind works in the city.

- New York City policy makers work with local community leaders to address a major concern - air pollution and asthma - by creating a renewable energy project that will also "turn off" an exceptionally polluting part of the existing system, called peaker plants. This was a very long process that required the participation of many community leaders and policy makers.  

- In Puerto Rico, people in small rural towns worked with their local mayors, and many created hurricane-resilient community centers by having donated solar panels and batteries installed on places like cafes and community centers.  

- In Highland Park, Soulardarity works very closely with the City of Highland Park in creating places for the off-grid solar powered streetlights; this involves getting access to the little strip of ground that the streetlight must stand on. This is kind of technical but it is a make-or-break detail that requires policymaker input and decisions. 

- In Highland Park, having a tiny solar off-grid garden shed provided a way for people to see a solar power system up close. It only made enough electricity for the garden tools but it was also easy, inexpensive, and tangible. Sometimes seeing these projects on a small scale allows people to glimpse the larger picture, and they learn a lot from them. Policy makers can work with community gardens, for example, to have small solar panel setups for the garden's use.    

From other places that have screened the film:  

- An Ohio city built low-income housing with solar panels, and held a big public event to educate the people who were going to get these homes about solar. (They screened How To Power A City at the event to help people learn about solar). 

- Another screening in Ohio brought a state representative to speak on a panel afterwards about her efforts to lead solar in Ohio. This was at a science museum and it helped show that solar is possible in the Midwest (because part of the film is in Michigan) and that there are steps to creating these systems, it's not all at once. 

Get a ticket to How To Power A City on 4/24

Film Spotlight: Q&A with Directors of Plastic People, Ben Addelman and Ziya Tong

One Earth (OE):Your film exposes the hidden presence of microplastics in our bodies and ecosystems. What surprised you most during the investigation?

Ziya: Seeing the lab results. The really strange thing to stomach in a way is the fact that you've got other people's garbage in your body.  Seeing other people's garbage floating around in your system is really quite shocking.

OE: How does the issue of plastic pollution illustrate why environmental solutions must be collective and systemic, not just individual?

Ben: People were trained to use disposable items, trained to throw out their coffee cups.  They were resistant to it at first.  We can go back to using glass or tin.  It's easier to start with something simple like single-use plastic, but it can make a big impact. 50% of all the plastic ever made has been made in the last 20 years.  By not using single-use plastic, our consumption would be reduced considerably.

OE: What changes,policy, industry, or cultural, do you believe are most urgent right now?

Ben: While we were in the middle of making our film, a very important treaty, a global treaty with all the countries around the world meeting to agree on solutions.  Called the Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee on Plastic Pollution, it was organized by the UN Environmental Program and continues to meet.  Cooperation and policies among all nations would help to address the environmental and health crisis.

Get a ticket to Plastic People on 4/23

Community Spotlight: Interview with Princess Harris, Sustainable Food & Land Use Senior Coordinator, Faith in Place

Visit with Princess Harris of Faith in Place at One Earth's Earth Day Action Fair Sunday, Apr 26.

One Earth (OE): What are the most pressing global challenges you’re currently focused on, and how do they connect to local communities like Chicago?

Princess Harris(PH): The most pressing global challenges I’m focused on are climate change, environmental justice, biodiversity loss, and food insecurity—and all of these are deeply connected to communities right here in Chicago.

Climate change is not just a global issue—it shows up locally through extreme heat, flooding, and shifting seasons along Lake Michigan. Environmental justice is central, because the impacts of pollution and climate stress are not felt equally—many frontline communities in Chicago experience higher exposure to poor air quality, limited green space, and fewer resources to adapt.

At the same time, biodiversity loss affects our local ecosystems, from pollinators like monarch butterflies to native plants that support healthy soil and water systems. And food insecurity continues to impact families across the city, making access to fresh, culturally relevant food a critical need.

What connects all of this is community. In Chicago, we can respond through local action—community gardens, stewardship of natural spaces, education, and partnerships that center the voices and leadership of residents. When we invest in local solutions, we’re not just addressing global challenges—we’re building resilience, equity, and sustainability right where we live.

(OE): How does your organization help Chicago residents engage with global issues like climate change, human rights, and sustainability?

(PH): At Faith in Place, we help residents in Chicago connect global issues like climate change, human rights, and sustainability to their everyday lives through community-based programs, education, and hands-on engagement.

We translate global challenges into local action. Through community gardens and garden classes, we address food insecurity and sustainability by teaching people how to grow their own food, care for the land, and build food sovereignty. Our Migration & Me program connects human migration stories—including the Great Migration—with the migration of species like monarch butterflies, helping participants understand climate change, displacement, and resilience on both a human and ecological level.

We also create opportunities for residents to directly engage with nature through stewardship days, nature outings, and events like Double Dutch Fest—spaces where people can build relationships with the environment while learning how to protect it. This work is grounded in environmental justice, ensuring that communities most impacted by climate and inequity are centered, heard, and equipped with tools to advocate for themselves.

Ultimately, we help people see that global issues are not distant—they are happening right here. And more importantly, we show that everyone has a role to play in creating a healthier, more just, and sustainable future.

(OE): If you could leave Chicago residents with one message this Earth Day, what would it be?

(PH): The care we show to our environment is the care we show to each other.

Here in Chicago, every small action—planting a seed, protecting a tree, showing up for a cleanup, or simply spending time in nature—connects us to something much larger. You don’t have to do everything—but you do have to do something. Care for the land in front of you. Listen to your community. Stay connected to the natural world.

Because when we take care of the Earth, we are also taking care of ourselves, our neighbors, and the generations that will come after us.